KBA vs VTI
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Index ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. KBA delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KBA | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.56% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $148M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.46% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 55 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +6.35% | +14.82% | |
| 1Y Return | +28.26% | +22.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.16% | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -1.34% | +12.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.8% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | KraneShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 4, 2014 | May 24, 2001 |
KBA vs VTI Performance
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Index ETF (KBA) is a ETF from KraneShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KBA returned +28.26% while VTI returned +22.43%. Year to date, KBA is up 6.35% versus a gain of 14.82% for VTI.
Over three years, KBA compounded at +15.16% per year against +21.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -1.34% and +12.34% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.16% annualized vs +6.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KBA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.8% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for KBA and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.36. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KBA charges 0.56% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $56 vs $3 annually, a gap of $53 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KBA currently yields 1.46% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
KBA and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2837 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KBA or VTI?
KBA has an expense ratio of 0.56% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $53 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KBA or VTI?
Over the past year KBA returned +28.26% vs +22.43% for VTI, so KBA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), KBA annualized +6.00% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KBA or VTI?
KBA has been the more volatile fund at 23.8% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: KBA -56.5% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both KBA and VTI?
KBA and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.36, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between KBA and VTI?
KBA and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2837 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, KBA or VTI?
KBA yields 1.46% while VTI yields 1.07%, so KBA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.