KCE vs VTI
State Street SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KCE | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $460M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.82% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 67 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +10.58% | +14.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +8.21% | +22.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.32% | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.04% | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.9% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -74.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | State Street Investment Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 8, 2005 | May 24, 2001 |
KCE vs VTI Performance
State Street SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF (KCE) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KCE returned +8.21% while VTI returned +22.19%. Year to date, KCE is up 10.58% versus a gain of 14.22% for VTI.
Over three years, KCE compounded at +25.32% per year against +21.27% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +13.04% and +12.23% respectively. Across the full 21-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.14% annualized vs +6.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KCE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.9% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -74.4% for KCE and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KCE charges 0.35% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KCE currently yields 1.82% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
KCE and VTI share 1 holdings out of 2783 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in KCE | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| IVZ | 1.54% | 0.02% | 1.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KCE or VTI?
KCE has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KCE or VTI?
Over the past year KCE returned +8.21% vs +22.19% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (21 years), KCE annualized +6.10% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KCE or VTI?
KCE has been the more volatile fund at 22.9% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: KCE -74.4% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both KCE and VTI?
KCE and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between KCE and VTI?
KCE and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2783 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, KCE or VTI?
KCE yields 1.82% while VTI yields 1.07%, so KCE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.