KCSH vs QQQ
KraneShares Sustainable Ultra Short Duration Index ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KCSH | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $161M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.22% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 79 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +2.22% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.81% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 0.4% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -0.6% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | KraneShares | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 26, 2024 | Mar 10, 1999 |
KCSH vs QQQ Performance
KraneShares Sustainable Ultra Short Duration Index ETF (KCSH) is a ETF from KraneShares and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year KCSH returned +3.81% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, KCSH is up 2.22% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 0.4% for KCSH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -0.6% for KCSH and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.03. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KCSH charges 0.20% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $18 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KCSH currently yields 4.22% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
KCSH and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 188 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KCSH or QQQ?
KCSH has an expense ratio of 0.20% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $2 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KCSH or QQQ?
Over the past year KCSH returned +3.81% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), KCSH annualized +4.22% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KCSH or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 0.4% for KCSH. Worst drawdown: KCSH -0.6% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both KCSH and QQQ?
KCSH and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.03, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between KCSH and QQQ?
KCSH and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 188 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, KCSH or QQQ?
KCSH yields 4.22% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so KCSH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.