KCSH vs VYM
KraneShares Sustainable Ultra Short Duration Index ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, KCSH or VYM?
Ultrashort Term Bond against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KCSH | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $160M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.22% | 2.24% |
| Holdings | 79 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +2.38% | +15.29%Best |
| 1Y Return | +4.11% | +22.23%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.81% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.14% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 0.5%Best | 9.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -0.6%Best | -14.5% |
| $10,000 over 2.1 years | $10,907 | $14,051Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 26.1% | 25.9%Best |
| Fund Family | KraneShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Ultrashort Term Bond | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jul 26, 2024 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 26, 2024 to Sep 3, 2026 (2.1 years).
KCSH vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.1 years both funds cover.
KCSH vs VYM Performance
KraneShares Sustainable Ultra Short Duration Index ETF (KCSH) is an ETF from KraneShares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KCSH returned +4.11% while VYM returned +22.23%. Year to date, KCSH is up 2.38% versus a gain of 15.29% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 9.9% compared with 0.5% for KCSH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -0.6% for KCSH and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.16. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KCSH charges 0.20% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $4 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KCSH currently yields 4.22% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 73 holdings in KCSH and 603 in VYM, totalling 95.9% and 99.5% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 73 positions we hold weights for in KCSH and 603 in VYM, against full books of 79 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 73 and 603 positions we hold weights for.
VYM holds 570 positions KCSH does not, 97.4% of the fund.
Largest: AVGO 7.29%, JPM 3.38%, JNJ 2.54%, XOM 2.36%, CAT 2.01%
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of KCSH and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KCSH or VYM?
KCSH has an expense ratio of 0.20% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $16 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, KCSH or VYM?
Over the past year KCSH returned +4.11% vs +22.23% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), KCSH annualized +4.22% vs +17.58% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, KCSH or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 9.9% annualized versus 0.5% for KCSH. Worst drawdown: KCSH -0.6% vs VYM -14.5%.
Should I hold both KCSH and VYM?
KCSH and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.16, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, KCSH or VYM?
KCSH yields 4.22% while VYM yields 2.24%, so KCSH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than KCSH?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.