KCSH vs VYM
KraneShares Sustainable Ultra Short Duration Index ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KCSH | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $171M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.24% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 79 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +2.18% | +16.53% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.91% | +25.03% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.25% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 0.5% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -0.6% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | KraneShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 26, 2024 | Nov 10, 2006 |
KCSH vs VYM Performance
KraneShares Sustainable Ultra Short Duration Index ETF (KCSH) is a ETF from KraneShares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KCSH returned +3.91% while VYM returned +25.03%. Year to date, KCSH is up 2.18% versus a gain of 16.53% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 0.5% for KCSH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -0.6% for KCSH and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.10. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KCSH charges 0.20% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $4 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KCSH currently yields 4.24% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
KCSH and VYM share 0 holdings out of 644 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KCSH or VYM?
KCSH has an expense ratio of 0.20% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $16 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KCSH or VYM?
Over the past year KCSH returned +3.91% vs +25.03% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), KCSH annualized +4.25% vs +7.10% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KCSH or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 0.5% for KCSH. Worst drawdown: KCSH -0.6% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both KCSH and VYM?
KCSH and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.10, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between KCSH and VYM?
KCSH and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 644 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, KCSH or VYM?
KCSH yields 4.24% while VYM yields 2.86%, so KCSH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.