KCSH vs VTI
KraneShares Sustainable Ultra Short Duration Index ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KCSH | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $161M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.22% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 79 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +2.26% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.83% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 0.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -0.6% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | KraneShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 26, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
KCSH vs VTI Performance
KraneShares Sustainable Ultra Short Duration Index ETF (KCSH) is a ETF from KraneShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KCSH returned +3.83% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, KCSH is up 2.26% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 0.4% for KCSH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -0.6% for KCSH and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.13. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KCSH charges 0.20% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $3 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KCSH currently yields 4.22% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
KCSH and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2873 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KCSH or VTI?
KCSH has an expense ratio of 0.20% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $17 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KCSH or VTI?
Over the past year KCSH returned +3.83% vs +21.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), KCSH annualized +4.24% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KCSH or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 0.4% for KCSH. Worst drawdown: KCSH -0.6% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both KCSH and VTI?
KCSH and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.13, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between KCSH and VTI?
KCSH and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2873 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, KCSH or VTI?
KCSH yields 4.22% while VTI yields 1.07%, so KCSH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.