KGRN vs VTI
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KGRN | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $53M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.94% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 53 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -14.19% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | -14.04% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -1.82% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -11.18% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 31.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -66.2% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | KraneShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 12, 2017 | May 24, 2001 |
KGRN vs VTI Performance
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF (KGRN) is a ETF from KraneShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KGRN returned -14.04% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, KGRN is down 14.19% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, KGRN compounded at -1.82% per year against +21.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -11.18% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.09% annualized vs +0.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KGRN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.6% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -66.2% for KGRN and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.34. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KGRN charges 0.79% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $3 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KGRN currently yields 0.94% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
KGRN and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2791 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KGRN or VTI?
KGRN has an expense ratio of 0.79% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $76 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KGRN or VTI?
Over the past year KGRN returned -14.04% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), KGRN annualized +0.86% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KGRN or VTI?
KGRN has been the more volatile fund at 31.6% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: KGRN -66.2% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both KGRN and VTI?
KGRN and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.34, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between KGRN and VTI?
KGRN and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2791 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, KGRN or VTI?
KGRN yields 0.94% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.