KGRN vs VOO
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KGRN | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $53M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.94% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 53 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -14.19% | +12.68% | |
| 1Y Return | -14.04% | +21.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -1.82% | +22.06% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -11.18% | +12.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 31.6% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -66.2% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | KraneShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 12, 2017 | Sep 7, 2010 |
KGRN vs VOO Performance
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF (KGRN) is a ETF from KraneShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KGRN returned -14.04% while VOO returned +21.87%. Year to date, KGRN is down 14.19% versus a gain of 12.68% for VOO.
Over three years, KGRN compounded at -1.82% per year against +22.06% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -11.18% and +12.95% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.47% annualized vs +0.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KGRN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.6% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -66.2% for KGRN and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.32. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KGRN charges 0.79% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $3 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KGRN currently yields 0.94% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
KGRN and VOO share 0 holdings out of 509 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KGRN or VOO?
KGRN has an expense ratio of 0.79% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $76 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KGRN or VOO?
Over the past year KGRN returned -14.04% vs +21.87% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), KGRN annualized +0.86% vs +13.47% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KGRN or VOO?
KGRN has been the more volatile fund at 31.6% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: KGRN -66.2% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both KGRN and VOO?
KGRN and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.32, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between KGRN and VOO?
KGRN and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 509 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, KGRN or VOO?
KGRN yields 0.94% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.