KGRN vs VXUS
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KGRN | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $54M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.99% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 53 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | -13.68% | +14.19% | |
| 1Y Return | -12.61% | +27.38% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -3.83% | +19.53% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -11.67% | +9.03% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 31.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -66.2% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | KraneShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 12, 2017 | Jan 26, 2011 |
KGRN vs VXUS Performance
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF (KGRN) is a ETF from KraneShares and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KGRN returned -12.61% while VXUS returned +27.38%. Year to date, KGRN is down 13.68% versus a gain of 14.19% for VXUS.
Over three years, KGRN compounded at -3.83% per year against +19.53% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are -11.67% and +9.03% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.83% annualized vs +0.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KGRN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.6% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -66.2% for KGRN and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.48. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KGRN charges 0.79% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $5 annually, a gap of $74 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KGRN currently yields 0.99% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
KGRN and VXUS share 3 holdings out of 7862 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KGRN or VXUS?
KGRN has an expense ratio of 0.79% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $74 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KGRN or VXUS?
Over the past year KGRN returned -12.61% vs +27.38% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), KGRN annualized +0.93% vs +4.83% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KGRN or VXUS?
KGRN has been the more volatile fund at 31.6% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: KGRN -66.2% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both KGRN and VXUS?
KGRN and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.48, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between KGRN and VXUS?
KGRN and VXUS share 3 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7862 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, KGRN or VXUS?
KGRN yields 0.99% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.