KMAR vs QQQ
Innovator US Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - March vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KMAR | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $33M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +13.55% | +19.52% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.80% | +26.68% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +26.64% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.0% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -10.1% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 3, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
KMAR vs QQQ Performance
Innovator US Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - March (KMAR) is a ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year KMAR returned +21.80% while QQQ returned +26.68%. Year to date, KMAR is up 13.55% versus a gain of 19.52% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 7.0% for KMAR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.1% for KMAR and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KMAR charges 0.79% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $18 annually, a gap of $61 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KMAR currently yields 0.00% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KMAR or QQQ?
KMAR has an expense ratio of 0.79% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $61 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KMAR or QQQ?
Over the past year KMAR returned +21.80% vs +26.68% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), KMAR annualized +19.67% vs +13.14% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KMAR or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 7.0% for KMAR. Worst drawdown: KMAR -10.1% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both KMAR and QQQ?
KMAR and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, KMAR or QQQ?
KMAR yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.