KMAR vs VOO
Innovator US Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - March vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. KMAR delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KMAR | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $34M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +12.86% | +13.44% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.50% | +22.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.0% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -10.1% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 3, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
KMAR vs VOO Performance
Innovator US Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - March (KMAR) is a ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KMAR returned +23.50% while VOO returned +22.62%. Year to date, KMAR is up 12.86% versus a gain of 13.44% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 7.0% for KMAR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.1% for KMAR and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KMAR charges 0.79% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $3 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KMAR currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for VOO.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KMAR or VOO?
KMAR has an expense ratio of 0.79% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $76 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KMAR or VOO?
Over the past year KMAR returned +23.50% vs +22.62% for VOO, so KMAR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), KMAR annualized +19.28% vs +13.55% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KMAR or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 7.0% for KMAR. Worst drawdown: KMAR -10.1% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both KMAR and VOO?
KMAR and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, KMAR or VOO?
KMAR yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.