KMAR vs SCHD

KMAR vs SCHD

Which is better, KMAR or SCHD?

Multi Alternative against Large Cap Value.

SCHD has a lower expense ratio. KMAR led over the full window, SCHD over 1Y.

Lower Fees: SCHDHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricKMARSCHD
Expense Ratio0.79%0.06%Best
AUM$32M$112.1B
Dividend Yield0.00%3.00%
Holdings12103
YTD Return+10.84%+23.46%Best
1Y Return+14.56%+27.20%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+15.41%
5Y Return (annualized)-+10.16%
Volatility (annualized)7.2%Best14.2%
Max Drawdown-10.1%Best-13.8%
$10,000 over 1.5 years$12,574Best$12,447
Fund FamilyInnovator ETFs TrustCharles Schwab Asset Management
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleMulti AlternativeLarge Cap Value
InceptionMar 3, 2025Oct 20, 2011

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 3, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026 (1.5 years).

KMAR vs SCHD growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.5 years both funds cover.

KMAR vs SCHD Performance

Innovator US Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - March (KMAR) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year KMAR returned +14.56% while SCHD returned +27.20%. Year to date, KMAR is up 10.84% versus a gain of 23.46% for SCHD.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

SCHD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.2% compared with 7.2% for KMAR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.1% for KMAR and -13.8% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.56. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

KMAR charges 0.79% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $6 annually, a gap of $73 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KMAR currently yields 0.00% against 3.00% for SCHD.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of KMAR and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

KMARSCHD

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, KMAR or SCHD?

KMAR has an expense ratio of 0.79% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $73 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, KMAR or SCHD?

Over the past year KMAR returned +14.56% vs +27.20% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), KMAR annualized +16.50% vs +15.71% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, KMAR or SCHD?

SCHD has been the more volatile fund at 14.2% annualized versus 7.2% for KMAR. Worst drawdown: KMAR -10.1% vs SCHD -13.8%.

Should I hold both KMAR and SCHD?

KMAR and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.56, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, KMAR or SCHD?

KMAR yields 0.00% while SCHD yields 3.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is SCHD better than KMAR?

SCHD has a lower expense ratio. KMAR led over the full window, SCHD over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.