KURE vs VOO
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KURE | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $98M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.50% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 54 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +7.62% | +13.44% | |
| 1Y Return | +0.87% | +22.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.79% | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -10.36% | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 28.2% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -68.5% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | KraneShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 31, 2018 | Sep 7, 2010 |
KURE vs VOO Performance
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF (KURE) is a ETF from KraneShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KURE returned +0.87% while VOO returned +22.62%. Year to date, KURE is up 7.62% versus a gain of 13.44% for VOO.
Over three years, KURE compounded at +3.79% per year against +21.47% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -10.36% and +13.27% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.55% annualized vs -0.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KURE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 28.2% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -68.5% for KURE and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.22. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KURE charges 0.65% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KURE currently yields 4.50% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
KURE and VOO share 0 holdings out of 550 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KURE or VOO?
KURE has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KURE or VOO?
Over the past year KURE returned +0.87% vs +22.62% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), KURE annualized -0.95% vs +13.55% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KURE or VOO?
KURE has been the more volatile fund at 28.2% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: KURE -68.5% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both KURE and VOO?
KURE and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.22, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between KURE and VOO?
KURE and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 550 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, KURE or VOO?
KURE yields 4.50% while VOO yields 1.09%, so KURE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.