KURE vs VYM
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KURE | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $98M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.50% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 54 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +7.62% | +16.16% | |
| 1Y Return | +0.87% | +26.05% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.79% | +18.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -10.36% | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 28.2% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -68.5% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | KraneShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 31, 2018 | Nov 10, 2006 |
KURE vs VYM Performance
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF (KURE) is a ETF from KraneShares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KURE returned +0.87% while VYM returned +26.05%. Year to date, KURE is up 7.62% versus a gain of 16.16% for VYM.
Over three years, KURE compounded at +3.79% per year against +18.43% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are -10.36% and +12.21% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.09% annualized vs -0.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KURE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 28.2% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -68.5% for KURE and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.20. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KURE charges 0.65% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $4 annually, a gap of $61 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KURE currently yields 4.50% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
KURE and VYM share 0 holdings out of 603 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KURE or VYM?
KURE has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $61 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KURE or VYM?
Over the past year KURE returned +0.87% vs +26.05% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), KURE annualized -0.95% vs +7.09% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KURE or VYM?
KURE has been the more volatile fund at 28.2% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: KURE -68.5% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both KURE and VYM?
KURE and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.20, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between KURE and VYM?
KURE and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 603 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, KURE or VYM?
KURE yields 4.50% while VYM yields 2.86%, so KURE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.