LCO vs QQQ

LCO vs QQQ

Which is better, LCO or QQQ?

Allocation/Balanced against Large Cap Growth.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. LCO is less concentrated, with 28.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.2%.

Lower Fees: QQQLess Concentrated: LCO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricLCOQQQ
Expense Ratio1.13%0.18%Best
AUM$58M$498.6B
Dividend Yield0.00%0.42%
Holdings89321
YTD Return+11.62%+22.67%Best
1Y Return-+24.33%
3Y Return (annualized)-+29.05%
5Y Return (annualized)-+17.00%
Top 10 Weight28.0%Best47.2%
Fund FamilyLOGIQ Capital LLCInvesco (US)
CategoryAllocation/BalancedEquity
StyleAllocation/BalancedLarge Cap Growth
InceptionJan 8, 2026Mar 10, 1999

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

LCO vs QQQ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

LCO vs QQQ Performance

LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF (LCO) is an ETF from LOGIQ Capital LLC and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, LCO is up 11.62% versus a gain of 22.67% for QQQ.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

LCO charges 1.13% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $113 vs $18 annually, a gap of $95 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LCO currently yields 0.00% against 0.42% for QQQ.

Holdings Overlap

LCO already in QQQ22.5%
QQQ already in LCO34.6%

22.5% of LCO's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 34.6% of QQQ's money is in holdings LCO also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

15 positions in common, counted across the 88 positions we hold weights for in LCO and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 89 and 321.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 81 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for LCO (63.2% of the fund), and 50 for LCO that do not appear in QQQ (60.3%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in LCOWeight in QQQDifference
NVDANvidia Corp2.00%8.45%6.45%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.2.52%4.85%2.33%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc1.78%4.41%2.63%
GOOGAlphabet Inc. C2.30%2.93%0.63%
METAMeta Platforms Inc2.08%3.07%0.99%
SNDKSandisk Corp/De3.22%1.07%2.15%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc0.51%3.71%3.20%
INTCIntel Corporation1.92%2.28%0.36%
PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc1.25%1.69%0.44%
LITELumentum Holdings Inc1.54%0.32%1.22%

34.6% of QQQ is already inside LCO.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

LCOQQQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, LCO or QQQ?

LCO has an expense ratio of 1.13% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $95 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between LCO and QQQ?

34.6% of QQQ's money is in holdings LCO also owns. 34.6% of QQQ's is in holdings LCO also owns. They hold 15 positions in common, counted across the 88 positions we hold weights for in LCO and 102 in QQQ.

Which pays a higher dividend, LCO or QQQ?

LCO yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QQQ better than LCO?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. LCO is less concentrated, with 28.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.