LGRO vs VXUS
Level Four Large Cap Growth Active ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LGRO | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $135M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.36% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 49 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +15.57% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.93% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.16% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.0% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -23.3% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 22, 2023 | Jan 26, 2011 |
LGRO vs VXUS Performance
Level Four Large Cap Growth Active ETF (LGRO) is a ETF from ALPS Advisors and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LGRO returned +26.93% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, LGRO is up 15.57% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, LGRO compounded at +24.16% per year against +19.27% for VXUS. Across the full 3-year window we track, LGRO has the edge at +24.16% annualized vs +4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LGRO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.0% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.3% for LGRO and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LGRO charges 0.50% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $5 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LGRO currently yields 0.36% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
LGRO and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7909 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LGRO or VXUS?
LGRO has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $45 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LGRO or VXUS?
Over the past year LGRO returned +26.93% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), LGRO annualized +24.16% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LGRO or VXUS?
LGRO has been the more volatile fund at 17.0% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: LGRO -23.3% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both LGRO and VXUS?
LGRO and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between LGRO and VXUS?
LGRO and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7909 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LGRO or VXUS?
LGRO yields 0.36% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.