IVV vs LGRO
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Level Four Large Cap Growth Active ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. LGRO delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | LGRO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.50% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $135M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.36% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 49 | |
| YTD Return | +14.50% | +17.09% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.02% | +25.31% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.80% | +24.56% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.37% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 17.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -23.3% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | ALPS Advisors | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Aug 22, 2023 |
IVV vs LGRO Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Level Four Large Cap Growth Active ETF (LGRO) is a ETF from ALPS Advisors. Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% while LGRO returned +25.31%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.50% versus a gain of 17.09% for LGRO.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.80% per year against +24.56% for LGRO. Across the full 3-year window we track, LGRO has the edge at +24.56% annualized vs +7.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LGRO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -23.3% for LGRO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while LGRO charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $50 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.36% for LGRO.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and LGRO share 38 holdings out of 515 unique holdings combined, representing a 38.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or LGRO?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while LGRO charges 0.50%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or LGRO?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% vs +25.31% for LGRO, so LGRO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), IVV annualized +7.07% vs +24.56% for LGRO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or LGRO?
LGRO has been the more volatile fund at 17.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs LGRO -23.3%.
Should I hold both IVV and LGRO?
IVV and LGRO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and LGRO?
IVV and LGRO share 38 common holdings with a 38.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 515 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or LGRO?
IVV yields 1.09% while LGRO yields 0.36%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.