LGRO vs VTI
Level Four Large Cap Growth Active ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. LGRO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LGRO | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $144M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.35% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 49 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +13.93% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.35% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.25% | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.9% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -23.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 22, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
LGRO vs VTI Performance
Level Four Large Cap Growth Active ETF (LGRO) is a ETF from ALPS Advisors and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LGRO returned +24.35% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, LGRO is up 13.93% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Over three years, LGRO compounded at +23.25% per year against +21.54% for VTI. Across the full 3-year window we track, LGRO has the edge at +23.25% annualized vs +8.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LGRO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.9% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.3% for LGRO and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LGRO charges 0.50% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LGRO currently yields 0.35% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
LGRO and VTI share 47 holdings out of 2788 unique holdings combined, representing a 34.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LGRO or VTI?
LGRO has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LGRO or VTI?
Over the past year LGRO returned +24.35% vs +21.39% for VTI, so LGRO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), LGRO annualized +23.25% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LGRO or VTI?
LGRO has been the more volatile fund at 16.9% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: LGRO -23.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both LGRO and VTI?
LGRO and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between LGRO and VTI?
LGRO and VTI share 47 common holdings with a 34.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2788 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LGRO or VTI?
LGRO yields 0.35% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.