LITP vs VTI
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, LITP or VTI?
Precious Metals against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 69.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LITP | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $34M | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 7.47% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 41 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | -29.53% | +12.51%Best |
| 1Y Return | +4.61% | +15.23%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -7.64% | +22.50%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.31% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 45.7% | 12.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -73.2% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.7 years | $5,424 | $18,904Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 69.5% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Sprott ETFS | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Commodity | Equity |
| Style | Precious Metals | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 1, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 2, 2023 to Oct 1, 2026 (3.7 years).
LITP vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.7 years both funds cover.
LITP vs VTI Performance
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) is an ETF from Sprott ETFS and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LITP returned +4.61% while VTI returned +15.23%. Year to date, LITP is down 29.53% versus a gain of 12.51% for VTI.
Over three years, LITP compounded at -7.64% per year against +22.50% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +18.78% annualized vs -15.24%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LITP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 45.7% compared with 12.6% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -73.2% for LITP and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.41. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LITP charges 0.65% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LITP currently yields 7.47% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
9.9% of LITP's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
LITP and VTI share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in LITP and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 41 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,149 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for LITP (97.4% of the fund), and 2 for LITP that do not appear in VTI (0.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LITP | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALBAlbemarle Corp. | 9.91% | 0.02% | 9.89% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of LITP and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LITP or VTI?
LITP has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $62 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, LITP or VTI?
Over the past year LITP returned +4.61% vs +15.23% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), LITP annualized -15.24% vs +18.78% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, LITP or VTI?
LITP has been the more volatile fund at 45.7% annualized versus 12.6% for VTI. Worst drawdown: LITP -73.2% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both LITP and VTI?
LITP and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.41, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between LITP and VTI?
9.9% of LITP's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.0% of VTI's is in holdings LITP also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in LITP and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, LITP or VTI?
LITP yields 7.47% while VTI yields 1.03%, so LITP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than LITP?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 69.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.