LITP vs VXUS
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. LITP delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LITP | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $41M | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 8.94% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 39 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | -7.68% | +15.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +60.07% | +26.86% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -2.71% | +20.34% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.38% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 44.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -73.2% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Sprott ETFS | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 1, 2023 | Jan 26, 2011 |
LITP vs VXUS Performance
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) is a ETF from Sprott ETFS and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LITP returned +60.07% while VXUS returned +26.86%. Year to date, LITP is down 7.68% versus a gain of 15.22% for VXUS.
Over three years, LITP compounded at -2.71% per year against +20.34% for VXUS. Across the full 4-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.89% annualized vs -9.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LITP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 44.7% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -73.2% for LITP and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.48. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LITP charges 0.65% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $5 annually, a gap of $60 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LITP currently yields 8.94% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
LITP and VXUS share 11 holdings out of 7896 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LITP or VXUS?
LITP has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $60 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LITP or VXUS?
Over the past year LITP returned +60.07% vs +26.86% for VXUS, so LITP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), LITP annualized -9.06% vs +4.89% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LITP or VXUS?
LITP has been the more volatile fund at 44.7% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: LITP -73.2% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both LITP and VXUS?
LITP and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.48, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between LITP and VXUS?
LITP and VXUS share 11 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7896 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LITP or VXUS?
LITP yields 8.94% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so LITP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.