LITP vs VOO
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. LITP delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LITP | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $41M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 8.94% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 39 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -11.08% | +13.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +54.36% | +21.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -4.00% | +22.16% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.42% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 44.3% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -73.2% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Sprott ETFS | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 1, 2023 | Sep 7, 2010 |
LITP vs VOO Performance
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) is a ETF from Sprott ETFS and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LITP returned +54.36% while VOO returned +21.62%. Year to date, LITP is down 11.08% versus a gain of 13.20% for VOO.
Over three years, LITP compounded at -4.00% per year against +22.16% for VOO. Across the full 4-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.51% annualized vs -9.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LITP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 44.3% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -73.2% for LITP and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.38. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LITP charges 0.65% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LITP currently yields 8.94% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
LITP and VOO share 1 holdings out of 542 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LITP | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALB | 9.64% | 0.02% | 9.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LITP or VOO?
LITP has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LITP or VOO?
Over the past year LITP returned +54.36% vs +21.62% for VOO, so LITP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), LITP annualized -9.98% vs +13.51% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LITP or VOO?
LITP has been the more volatile fund at 44.3% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: LITP -73.2% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both LITP and VOO?
LITP and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.38, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between LITP and VOO?
LITP and VOO share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 542 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LITP or VOO?
LITP yields 8.94% while VOO yields 1.08%, so LITP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.