LITP vs VOO
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, LITP or VOO?
Precious Metals against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. LITP led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 71.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LITP | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $43M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 8.94% | 1.08% |
| Holdings | 39 | 509 |
| YTD Return | -10.10% | +12.74%Best |
| 1Y Return | +47.09%Best | +19.43% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -3.14% | +21.18%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.76% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 44.6% | 12.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -73.2% | -18.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.6 years | $6,965 | $19,283Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 71.0% | 36.4%Best |
| Fund Family | Sprott ETFS | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Commodity | Equity |
| Style | Precious Metals | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 1, 2023 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 2, 2023 to Sep 8, 2026 (3.6 years).
LITP vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.6 years both funds cover.
LITP vs VOO Performance
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) is an ETF from Sprott ETFS and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LITP returned +47.09% while VOO returned +19.43%. Year to date, LITP is down 10.10% versus a gain of 12.74% for VOO.
Over three years, LITP compounded at -3.14% per year against +21.18% for VOO. Across the full 4-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +20.01% annualized vs -9.56%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LITP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 44.6% compared with 12.4% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -73.2% for LITP and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.38. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LITP charges 0.65% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LITP currently yields 8.94% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
9.6% of LITP's money is in holdings VOO also owns.
LITP and VOO share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 38 positions we hold weights for in LITP and 504 in VOO, against full books of 39 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 493 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for LITP (99.3% of the fund), and 1 for LITP that do not appear in VOO (0.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LITP | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALBAlbemarle Corp. | 9.64% | 0.02% | 9.62% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of LITP and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LITP or VOO?
LITP has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $62 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, LITP or VOO?
Over the past year LITP returned +47.09% vs +19.43% for VOO, so LITP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), LITP annualized -9.56% vs +20.01% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, LITP or VOO?
LITP has been the more volatile fund at 44.6% annualized versus 12.4% for VOO. Worst drawdown: LITP -73.2% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both LITP and VOO?
LITP and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.38, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between LITP and VOO?
9.6% of LITP's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 0.0% of VOO's is in holdings LITP also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 38 positions we hold weights for in LITP and 504 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, LITP or VOO?
LITP yields 8.94% while VOO yields 1.08%, so LITP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than LITP?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. LITP led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 71.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.