LQPE vs VXUS
PEO AlphaQuest Thematic PE ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, LQPE or VXUS?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LQPE | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.25% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $13M | $158.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.27% | 2.51% |
| Holdings | 262 | 8,747 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.1%Best | 12.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.9% | -13.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.1 years | $9,202 | $12,896Best |
| Fund Family | Alpha Quest | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 27, 2025 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 171 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. LQPE has data through Mar 23, 2026 and VXUS through Sep 10, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 28, 2025 to Mar 23, 2026 (1.1 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.4% compared with 11.1% for LQPE. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.9% for LQPE and -13.6% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.57. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LQPE charges 1.25% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $125 vs $5 annually, a gap of $120 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LQPE currently yields 0.27% against 2.51% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 193 holdings in LQPE and 8,091 in VXUS, totalling 88.5% and 87.7% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 1 positions appear in both.
The two holdings books were reported 181 days apart, LQPE as of Dec 31, 2025 and VXUS as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
1 positions in common, counted across the 193 positions we hold weights for in LQPE and 8,091 in VXUS, against full books of 262 and 8,747.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LQPE | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CLW:AUCharter Hall Long Wale Reit | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.07% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of LQPE and VXUS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LQPE or VXUS?
LQPE has an expense ratio of 1.25% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $120 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, LQPE or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 12.4% annualized versus 11.1% for LQPE. Worst drawdown: LQPE -18.9% vs VXUS -13.6%.
Should I hold both LQPE and VXUS?
LQPE and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.57, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, LQPE or VXUS?
LQPE yields 0.27% while VXUS yields 2.51%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than LQPE?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.