LQPE vs SPY
PEO AlphaQuest Thematic PE ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Quick Verdict
SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPY offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LQPE | SPY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.25% | 0.09% | |
| AUM | $13M | $821.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.27% | 1.01% | |
| Holdings | 262 | 505 | |
| YTD Return | -2.63% | +12.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +0.06% | +21.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.98% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.89% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.1% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -18.9% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Alpha Quest | State Street Investment Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 27, 2025 | Jan 22, 1993 |
LQPE vs SPY Performance
PEO AlphaQuest Thematic PE ETF (LQPE) is a ETF from Alpha Quest and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year LQPE returned +0.06% while SPY returned +21.82%. Year to date, LQPE is down 2.63% versus a gain of 12.68% for SPY.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SPY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 11.1% for LQPE. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.9% for LQPE and -56.5% for SPY. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.54. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LQPE charges 1.25% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $125 vs $9 annually, a gap of $116 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LQPE currently yields 0.27% against 1.01% for SPY.
Holdings Overlap
LQPE and SPY share 40 holdings out of 657 unique holdings combined, representing a 4.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LQPE or SPY?
LQPE has an expense ratio of 1.25% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $116 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LQPE or SPY?
Over the past year LQPE returned +0.06% vs +21.82% for SPY, so SPY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), LQPE annualized -7.28% vs +8.81% for SPY. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LQPE or SPY?
SPY has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 11.1% for LQPE. Worst drawdown: LQPE -18.9% vs SPY -56.5%.
Should I hold both LQPE and SPY?
LQPE and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.54, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between LQPE and SPY?
LQPE and SPY share 40 common holdings with a 4.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 657 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LQPE or SPY?
LQPE yields 0.27% while SPY yields 1.01%, so SPY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.