LTTI vs SCHD
FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, LTTI or SCHD?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LTTI | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $15M | $112.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 9.50% | 3.00% |
| Holdings | 12 | 103 |
| YTD Return | -3.31% | +23.60%Best |
| 1Y Return | -3.51% | +28.29%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +16.25% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +10.25% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.8%Best | 14.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -9.0%Best | -14.0% |
| $10,000 over 1.6 years | $9,845 | $12,787Best |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Feb 12, 2025 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 13, 2025 to Sep 21, 2026 (1.6 years).
LTTI vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.6 years both funds cover.
LTTI vs SCHD Performance
FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF (LTTI) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year LTTI returned -3.51% while SCHD returned +28.29%. Year to date, LTTI is down 3.31% versus a gain of 23.60% for SCHD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCHD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.0% compared with 7.8% for LTTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.0% for LTTI and -14.0% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.13. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LTTI charges 0.65% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $6 annually, a gap of $59 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LTTI currently yields 9.50% against 3.00% for SCHD.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of LTTI and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LTTI or SCHD?
LTTI has an expense ratio of 0.65% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $59 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, LTTI or SCHD?
Over the past year LTTI returned -3.51% vs +28.29% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), LTTI annualized -0.97% vs +16.61% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, LTTI or SCHD?
SCHD has been the more volatile fund at 14.0% annualized versus 7.8% for LTTI. Worst drawdown: LTTI -9.0% vs SCHD -14.0%.
Should I hold both LTTI and SCHD?
LTTI and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.13, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, LTTI or SCHD?
LTTI yields 9.50% while SCHD yields 3.00%, so LTTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than LTTI?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.