LYLD vs QQQ
Cambria LargeCap Shareholder Yield ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LYLD | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $9M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.00% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 52 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +19.33% | +17.07% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.77% | +26.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +26.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.18% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.2% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -18.6% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Cambria Investment Management | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 12, 2024 | Mar 10, 1999 |
LYLD vs QQQ Performance
Cambria LargeCap Shareholder Yield ETF (LYLD) is a ETF from Cambria Investment Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year LYLD returned +25.77% while QQQ returned +26.39%. Year to date, LYLD is up 19.33% versus a gain of 17.07% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 13.2% for LYLD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.6% for LYLD and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.17. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LYLD charges 0.59% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $18 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LYLD currently yields 2.00% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
LYLD and QQQ share 4 holdings out of 149 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LYLD or QQQ?
LYLD has an expense ratio of 0.59% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $41 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LYLD or QQQ?
Over the past year LYLD returned +25.77% vs +26.39% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), LYLD annualized +16.29% vs +13.05% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LYLD or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 13.2% for LYLD. Worst drawdown: LYLD -18.6% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both LYLD and QQQ?
LYLD and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.17, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between LYLD and QQQ?
LYLD and QQQ share 4 common holdings with a 1.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 149 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LYLD or QQQ?
LYLD yields 2.00% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so LYLD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.