MAGS vs VYM
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MAGS | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $4.4B | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.48% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 25 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +2.13% | +15.75% | |
| 1Y Return | +10.64% | +23.85% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +31.51% | +19.14% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.45% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.6% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -29.4% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Roundhill Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 11, 2023 | Nov 10, 2006 |
MAGS vs VYM Performance
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) is a ETF from Roundhill Investments and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MAGS returned +10.64% while VYM returned +23.85%. Year to date, MAGS is up 2.13% versus a gain of 15.75% for VYM.
Over three years, MAGS compounded at +31.51% per year against +19.14% for VYM. Across the full 3-year window we track, MAGS has the edge at +35.69% annualized vs +7.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MAGS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.6% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.4% for MAGS and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.38. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MAGS charges 0.30% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $4 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MAGS currently yields 1.48% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
MAGS and VYM share 0 holdings out of 612 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MAGS or VYM?
MAGS has an expense ratio of 0.30% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $26 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MAGS or VYM?
Over the past year MAGS returned +10.64% vs +23.85% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), MAGS annualized +35.69% vs +7.06% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MAGS or VYM?
MAGS has been the more volatile fund at 21.6% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: MAGS -29.4% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both MAGS and VYM?
MAGS and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.38, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MAGS and VYM?
MAGS and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 612 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MAGS or VYM?
MAGS yields 1.48% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.