MAGS vs VTI
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, MAGS or VTI?
Each has led over a different period.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. MAGS led over 3Y and the full window, VTI over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MAGS | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $5.4B | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.42% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 25 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +11.08% | +13.35%Best |
| 1Y Return | +11.69% | +15.92%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +35.75%Best | +23.41% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.83% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.1% | 12.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -29.4% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.5 years | $30,491Best | $19,493 |
| Fund Family | Roundhill Investments | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 11, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 11, 2023 to Oct 2, 2026 (3.5 years).
MAGS vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.5 years both funds cover.
MAGS vs VTI Performance
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) is an ETF from Roundhill Investments and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MAGS returned +11.69% while VTI returned +15.92%. Year to date, MAGS is up 11.08% versus a gain of 13.35% for VTI.
Over three years, MAGS compounded at +35.75% per year against +23.41% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, MAGS has the edge at +37.51% annualized vs +21.01%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MAGS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.1% compared with 12.9% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.4% for MAGS and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MAGS charges 0.30% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $3 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MAGS currently yields 1.42% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 26.9% of VTI's money is in holdings MAGS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for MAGS, our book for it covers 43.8% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
VTI and MAGS share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, MAGS as of Sep 15, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
7 positions in common, counted across the 9 positions we hold weights for in MAGS and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 25 and 3,524.
26.9% of VTI is already inside MAGS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MAGS or VTI?
MAGS has an expense ratio of 0.30% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $27 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MAGS or VTI?
Over the past year MAGS returned +11.69% vs +15.92% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), MAGS annualized +37.51% vs +21.01% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MAGS or VTI?
MAGS has been the more volatile fund at 21.1% annualized versus 12.9% for VTI. Worst drawdown: MAGS -29.4% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both MAGS and VTI?
MAGS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between MAGS and VTI?
At least 26.9% of VTI's money is in holdings MAGS also owns. Our book for MAGS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 7 positions in common, counted across the 9 positions we hold weights for in MAGS and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, MAGS or VTI?
MAGS yields 1.42% while VTI yields 1.03%, so MAGS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than MAGS?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. MAGS led over 3Y and the full window, VTI over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.