IVV vs MAGS
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
Which is better, IVV or MAGS?
Each has led over a different period.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, MAGS over 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | MAGS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.30% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $4.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 1.42% |
| Holdings | 508 | 25 |
| YTD Return | +12.24%Best | +6.07% |
| 1Y Return | +18.61%Best | +12.31% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.98% | +30.93%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.76% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.7%Best | 21.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8%Best | -29.4% |
| $10,000 over 3.4 years | $19,389 | $28,782Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Roundhill Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Apr 11, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 11, 2023 to Sep 9, 2026 (3.4 years).
IVV vs MAGS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.4 years both funds cover.
IVV vs MAGS Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) is an ETF from Roundhill Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +18.61% while MAGS returned +12.31%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.24% versus a gain of 6.07% for MAGS.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +20.98% per year against +30.93% for MAGS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MAGS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.3% compared with 12.7% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -29.4% for MAGS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while MAGS charges 0.30%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $30 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 1.42% for MAGS.
Holdings Overlap
At least 30.8% of IVV's money is in holdings MAGS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for MAGS, our book for it covers 41.8% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
7 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 9 in MAGS, against full books of 508 and 25.
30.8% of IVV is already inside MAGS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or MAGS?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MAGS charges 0.30%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $27 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or MAGS?
Over the past year IVV returned +18.61% vs +12.31% for MAGS, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or MAGS?
MAGS has been the more volatile fund at 21.3% annualized versus 12.7% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs MAGS -29.4%.
Should I hold both IVV and MAGS?
IVV and MAGS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and MAGS?
At least 30.8% of IVV's money is in holdings MAGS also owns. Our book for MAGS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 7 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 9 in MAGS.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MAGS?
IVV yields 1.06% while MAGS yields 1.42%, so MAGS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MAGS better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, MAGS over 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.