MANI vs QQQ
Man Active Income ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, MANI or QQQ?
Investment Grade Bond against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MANI | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $22M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.66% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 89 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +6.42% | +17.21%Best |
| 1Y Return | +9.09% | +22.10%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.27% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.60% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 1.7%Best | 21.9% |
| Fund Family | Man Solutions LLC | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Investment Grade Bond | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Sep 16, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
MANI vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
MANI vs QQQ Performance
Man Active Income ETF (MANI) is an ETF from Man Solutions LLC and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year MANI returned +9.09% while QQQ returned +22.10%. Year to date, MANI is up 6.42% versus a gain of 17.21% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.9% compared with 1.7% for MANI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MANI charges 0.85% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $18 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MANI currently yields 4.66% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 11 holdings in MANI and 102 in QQQ, totalling 10.8% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 11 positions we hold weights for in MANI and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 89 and 107.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of MANI and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MANI or QQQ?
MANI has an expense ratio of 0.85% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $67 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MANI or QQQ?
Over the past year MANI returned +9.09% vs +22.10% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MANI or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 21.9% annualized versus 1.7% for MANI.
Should I hold both MANI and QQQ?
MANI and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, MANI or QQQ?
MANI yields 4.66% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so MANI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than MANI?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.