MART vs VOO

MART vs VOO

Which is better, MART or VOO?

Nearly the same fund. VOO costs less.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricMARTVOO
Expense Ratio0.74%0.03%Best
AUM$31M$997.4B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.04%
Holdings5509
YTD Return+10.58%+12.37%Best
1Y Return+14.22%+16.61%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+15.93%+21.37%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.49%
Volatility (annualized)7.8%Best12.5%
Max Drawdown-11.6%Best-18.7%
$10,000 over 3.6 years$17,324$20,478Best
Fund FamilyAllianzIMVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionFeb 28, 2023Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 1, 2023 to Sep 18, 2026 (3.6 years).

MART vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.6 years both funds cover.

MART vs VOO Performance

AllianzIM US Equity Buffer10 Mar ETF (MART) is an ETF from AllianzIM and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MART returned +14.22% while VOO returned +16.61%. Year to date, MART is up 10.58% versus a gain of 12.37% for VOO.

Over three years, MART compounded at +15.93% per year against +21.37% for VOO. Across the full 4-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +22.03% annualized vs +16.49%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.5% compared with 7.8% for MART. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.6% for MART and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

MART charges 0.74% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $74 vs $3 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MART currently yields 0.00% against 1.04% for VOO.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of MART and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

MARTVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, MART or VOO?

MART has an expense ratio of 0.74% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $71 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, MART or VOO?

Over the past year MART returned +14.22% vs +16.61% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), MART annualized +16.49% vs +22.03% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, MART or VOO?

VOO has been the more volatile fund at 12.5% annualized versus 7.8% for MART. Worst drawdown: MART -11.6% vs VOO -18.7%.

Should I hold both MART and VOO?

MART and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, MART or VOO?

MART yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than MART?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.