MCHU vs VTI
Tradr 2X Long MCHP Daily ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MCHU | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.30% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $500,747.89 | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 4 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -44.39% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | -44.39% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 25057.9% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -96.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Tradr ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | May 27, 2026 | May 24, 2001 |
MCHU vs VTI Performance
Tradr 2X Long MCHP Daily ETF (MCHU) is a ETF from Tradr ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MCHU returned -44.39% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, MCHU is down 44.39% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MCHU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 25057.9% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -96.3% for MCHU and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.12. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MCHU charges 1.30% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $130 vs $3 annually, a gap of $127 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MCHU currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MCHU or VTI?
MCHU has an expense ratio of 1.30% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $127 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MCHU or VTI?
Over the past year MCHU returned -44.39% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), MCHU annualized +36.77% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MCHU or VTI?
MCHU has been the more volatile fund at 25057.9% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: MCHU -96.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both MCHU and VTI?
MCHU and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.12, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, MCHU or VTI?
MCHU yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.