MCHU vs VOO
Tradr 2X Long MCHP Daily ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MCHU | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.30% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $500,747.89 | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 4 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -44.39% | +12.68% | |
| 1Y Return | -44.39% | +21.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.06% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 25057.9% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -96.3% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Tradr ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | May 27, 2026 | Sep 7, 2010 |
MCHU vs VOO Performance
Tradr 2X Long MCHP Daily ETF (MCHU) is a ETF from Tradr ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MCHU returned -44.39% while VOO returned +21.87%. Year to date, MCHU is down 44.39% versus a gain of 12.68% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MCHU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 25057.9% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -96.3% for MCHU and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.25. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MCHU charges 1.30% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $130 vs $3 annually, a gap of $127 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MCHU currently yields 0.00% against 1.08% for VOO.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MCHU or VOO?
MCHU has an expense ratio of 1.30% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $127 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MCHU or VOO?
Over the past year MCHU returned -44.39% vs +21.87% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), MCHU annualized +36.77% vs +13.47% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MCHU or VOO?
MCHU has been the more volatile fund at 25057.9% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: MCHU -96.3% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both MCHU and VOO?
MCHU and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.25, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, MCHU or VOO?
MCHU yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.