MCHU vs VYM
Tradr 2X Long MCHP Daily ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MCHU | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.30% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $500,747.89 | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 4 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | -44.39% | +15.34% | |
| 1Y Return | -44.39% | +23.24% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.22% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 25057.9% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -96.3% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Tradr ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | May 27, 2026 | Nov 10, 2006 |
MCHU vs VYM Performance
Tradr 2X Long MCHP Daily ETF (MCHU) is a ETF from Tradr ETFs and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MCHU returned -44.39% while VYM returned +23.24%. Year to date, MCHU is down 44.39% versus a gain of 15.34% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MCHU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 25057.9% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -96.3% for MCHU and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.03. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MCHU charges 1.30% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $130 vs $4 annually, a gap of $126 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MCHU currently yields 0.00% against 2.24% for VYM.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MCHU or VYM?
MCHU has an expense ratio of 1.30% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $126 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MCHU or VYM?
Over the past year MCHU returned -44.39% vs +23.24% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), MCHU annualized +36.77% vs +7.04% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MCHU or VYM?
MCHU has been the more volatile fund at 25057.9% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: MCHU -96.3% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both MCHU and VYM?
MCHU and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.03, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, MCHU or VYM?
MCHU yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.