MGMT vs VOO
Ballast Small/Mid Cap ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. MGMT delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MGMT | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.10% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $176M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.30% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 55 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +16.01% | +12.95% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.05% | +20.69% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.95% | +22.09% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.33% | +13.40% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.1% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -24.9% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Ballast Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 2, 2020 | Sep 7, 2010 |
MGMT vs VOO Performance
Ballast Small/Mid Cap ETF (MGMT) is a ETF from Ballast Asset Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MGMT returned +21.05% while VOO returned +20.69%. Year to date, MGMT is up 16.01% versus a gain of 12.95% for VOO.
Over three years, MGMT compounded at +14.95% per year against +22.09% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +8.33% and +13.40% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, MGMT has the edge at +13.91% annualized vs +13.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MGMT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.1% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.9% for MGMT and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MGMT charges 1.10% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $110 vs $3 annually, a gap of $107 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MGMT currently yields 0.30% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
MGMT and VOO share 0 holdings out of 560 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MGMT or VOO?
MGMT has an expense ratio of 1.10% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $107 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MGMT or VOO?
Over the past year MGMT returned +21.05% vs +20.69% for VOO, so MGMT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), MGMT annualized +13.91% vs +13.50% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MGMT or VOO?
MGMT has been the more volatile fund at 18.1% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: MGMT -24.9% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both MGMT and VOO?
MGMT and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MGMT and VOO?
MGMT and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 560 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MGMT or VOO?
MGMT yields 0.30% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.