MGMT vs VXUS
Ballast Small/Mid Cap ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MGMT | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.10% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $176M | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.30% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 55 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +17.36% | +15.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.78% | +26.86% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.85% | +20.34% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.25% | +9.38% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -24.9% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Ballast Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 2, 2020 | Jan 26, 2011 |
MGMT vs VXUS Performance
Ballast Small/Mid Cap ETF (MGMT) is a ETF from Ballast Asset Management and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MGMT returned +21.78% while VXUS returned +26.86%. Year to date, MGMT is up 17.36% versus a gain of 15.22% for VXUS.
Over three years, MGMT compounded at +14.85% per year against +20.34% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +8.25% and +9.38% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, MGMT has the edge at +14.18% annualized vs +4.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MGMT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.1% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.9% for MGMT and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MGMT charges 1.10% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $110 vs $5 annually, a gap of $105 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MGMT currently yields 0.30% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
MGMT and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7924 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MGMT or VXUS?
MGMT has an expense ratio of 1.10% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $105 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MGMT or VXUS?
Over the past year MGMT returned +21.78% vs +26.86% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), MGMT annualized +14.18% vs +4.89% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MGMT or VXUS?
MGMT has been the more volatile fund at 18.1% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: MGMT -24.9% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both MGMT and VXUS?
MGMT and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MGMT and VXUS?
MGMT and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7924 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MGMT or VXUS?
MGMT yields 0.30% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.