MGMT vs VTI
Ballast Small/Mid Cap ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MGMT | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.10% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $176M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.30% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 55 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +16.08% | +13.67% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.13% | +22.17% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.96% | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.64% | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.1% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -24.9% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Ballast Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 2, 2020 | May 24, 2001 |
MGMT vs VTI Performance
Ballast Small/Mid Cap ETF (MGMT) is a ETF from Ballast Asset Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MGMT returned +21.13% while VTI returned +22.17%. Year to date, MGMT is up 16.08% versus a gain of 13.67% for VTI.
Over three years, MGMT compounded at +14.96% per year against +21.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +8.64% and +12.51% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, MGMT has the edge at +13.92% annualized vs +8.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MGMT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.1% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.9% for MGMT and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MGMT charges 1.10% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $110 vs $3 annually, a gap of $107 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MGMT currently yields 0.30% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
MGMT and VTI share 32 holdings out of 2810 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MGMT or VTI?
MGMT has an expense ratio of 1.10% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $107 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MGMT or VTI?
Over the past year MGMT returned +21.13% vs +22.17% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), MGMT annualized +13.92% vs +8.11% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MGMT or VTI?
MGMT has been the more volatile fund at 18.1% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: MGMT -24.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both MGMT and VTI?
MGMT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MGMT and VTI?
MGMT and VTI share 32 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2810 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MGMT or VTI?
MGMT yields 0.30% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.