MGNR vs VXUS
American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, MGNR or VXUS?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. MGNR led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MGNR | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $198M | $158.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.75% | 2.51% |
| Holdings | 45 | 8,747 |
| YTD Return | +21.81%Best | +14.48% |
| 1Y Return | +41.26%Best | +22.28% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.00% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +8.91% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.8% | 11.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -22.1% | -13.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.6 years | $22,874Best | $16,309 |
| Fund Family | American Beacon Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 5, 2024 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 6, 2024 to Sep 11, 2026 (2.6 years).
MGNR vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.6 years both funds cover.
MGNR vs VXUS Performance
American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR) is an ETF from American Beacon Funds and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MGNR returned +41.26% while VXUS returned +22.28%. Year to date, MGNR is up 21.81% versus a gain of 14.48% for VXUS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MGNR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.8% compared with 11.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.1% for MGNR and -13.6% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MGNR charges 0.75% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $5 annually, a gap of $70 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MGNR currently yields 0.75% against 2.51% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
At least 41.6% of MGNR's money is in holdings VXUS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VXUS, our book for it covers 87.7% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 51 days apart, MGNR as of Aug 20, 2026 and VXUS as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
16 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in MGNR and 8,091 in VXUS, against full books of 45 and 8,747.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MGNR | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| HBM:CAHudbay Minerals Inc | 4.73% | 0.02% | 4.71% |
| MT:LUArcelormittal Ordinary Shares | 4.29% | 0.06% | 4.23% |
| FM:CAFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd | 4.09% | 0.04% | 4.05% |
| TECK:CATeck Resources Ltd | 4.03% | 0.06% | 3.97% |
| KGC:CAKinross Gold Corp | 3.67% | 0.06% | 3.61% |
| EQX:CAEquinox Gold Corp | 3.69% | 0.02% | 3.67% |
| NESTE:FINeste Oyj | 2.71% | 0.03% | 2.68% |
| CS:CACapstone Mining Corp | 2.68% | 0.01% | 2.67% |
| MX:CAMethanex Corp | 2.61% | 0.01% | 2.60% |
| GFI:ZAGold Fields Limited Sponsored Adr (1 Ads : 1 Ordinary) | 2.53% | 0.07% | 2.46% |
41.6% of MGNR is already inside VXUS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MGNR or VXUS?
MGNR has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $70 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MGNR or VXUS?
Over the past year MGNR returned +41.26% vs +22.28% for VXUS, so MGNR leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MGNR or VXUS?
MGNR has been the more volatile fund at 21.8% annualized versus 11.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: MGNR -22.1% vs VXUS -13.6%.
Should I hold both MGNR and VXUS?
MGNR and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between MGNR and VXUS?
At least 41.6% of MGNR's money is in holdings VXUS also owns. Our book for VXUS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 16 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in MGNR and 8,091 in VXUS.
Which pays a higher dividend, MGNR or VXUS?
MGNR yields 0.75% while VXUS yields 2.51%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than MGNR?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. MGNR led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.