MGNR vs VYM
American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, MGNR or VYM?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. MGNR led over 1Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MGNR | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $198M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.75% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 45 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +22.08%Best | +13.15% |
| 1Y Return | +43.69%Best | +17.82% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +17.99% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.16% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.8% | 10.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -22.1% | -14.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.6 years | $22,943Best | $15,357 |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.7% | 25.9%Best |
| Fund Family | American Beacon Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Feb 5, 2024 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 6, 2024 to Sep 10, 2026 (2.6 years).
MGNR vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.6 years both funds cover.
MGNR vs VYM Performance
American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR) is an ETF from American Beacon Funds and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MGNR returned +43.69% while VYM returned +17.82%. Year to date, MGNR is up 22.08% versus a gain of 13.15% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MGNR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.8% compared with 10.4% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.1% for MGNR and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MGNR charges 0.75% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $4 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MGNR currently yields 0.75% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
20.9% of MGNR's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.9% of VYM's money is in holdings MGNR also owns.
MGNR and VYM share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 51 days apart, MGNR as of Aug 20, 2026 and VYM as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
10 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in MGNR and 603 in VYM, against full books of 45 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 559 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for MGNR (96.7% of the fund), and 12 for MGNR that do not appear in VYM (26.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MGNR | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWR:IESmurfit Westrock Plc | 4.15% | 0.10% | 4.05% |
| RRCRange Resources Corp | 3.81% | 0.04% | 3.77% |
| BGBunge Global Sa Common Shares | 3.11% | 0.06% | 3.05% |
| EQTEqt Corp | 2.36% | 0.13% | 2.23% |
| FANGDiamondback Energy Inc. | 2.18% | 0.14% | 2.04% |
| PRCentennial Resource Development Inc/de | 2.19% | 0.06% | 2.13% |
| IPInternational Paper Co. | 1.59% | 0.08% | 1.51% |
| CFCf Industries Holdings Inc. | 0.98% | 0.07% | 0.91% |
| PKGPackaging Corp. Of America | 0.56% | 0.09% | 0.47% |
| KRKroger Co. | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.13% |
20.9% of MGNR is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MGNR or VYM?
MGNR has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $71 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MGNR or VYM?
Over the past year MGNR returned +43.69% vs +17.82% for VYM, so MGNR leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MGNR or VYM?
MGNR has been the more volatile fund at 21.8% annualized versus 10.4% for VYM. Worst drawdown: MGNR -22.1% vs VYM -14.5%.
Should I hold both MGNR and VYM?
MGNR and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between MGNR and VYM?
20.9% of MGNR's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.9% of VYM's is in holdings MGNR also owns. They hold 10 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in MGNR and 603 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, MGNR or VYM?
MGNR yields 0.75% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than MGNR?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. MGNR led over 1Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.