MGNR vs VOO
American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. MGNR delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MGNR | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $198M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.84% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 45 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +24.98% | +12.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +61.38% | +21.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.06% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.4% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -22.1% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | American Beacon Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 5, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
MGNR vs VOO Performance
American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR) is a ETF from American Beacon Funds and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MGNR returned +61.38% while VOO returned +21.87%. Year to date, MGNR is up 24.98% versus a gain of 12.68% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MGNR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.4% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.1% for MGNR and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.41. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MGNR charges 0.75% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MGNR currently yields 0.84% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
MGNR and VOO share 8 holdings out of 539 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MGNR or VOO?
MGNR has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MGNR or VOO?
Over the past year MGNR returned +61.38% vs +21.87% for VOO, so MGNR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), MGNR annualized +39.87% vs +13.47% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MGNR or VOO?
MGNR has been the more volatile fund at 22.4% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: MGNR -22.1% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both MGNR and VOO?
MGNR and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.41, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MGNR and VOO?
MGNR and VOO share 8 common holdings with a 0.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 539 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MGNR or VOO?
MGNR yields 0.84% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.