MID vs VXUS
MID vs VXUS
American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MID | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $100M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.15% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 39 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +5.76% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +4.70% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.48% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.08% | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -40.1% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | American Century Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 15, 2020 | Jan 26, 2011 |
MID vs VXUS Performance
American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF (MID) is a ETF from American Century Investments and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MID returned +4.70% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, MID is up 5.76% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, MID compounded at +13.48% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +3.08% and +9.28% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, MID has the edge at +9.64% annualized vs +4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MID has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.5% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -40.1% for MID and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MID charges 0.45% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $5 annually, a gap of $40 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MID currently yields 0.15% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
MID and VXUS share 2 holdings out of 7893 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MID or VXUS?
MID has an expense ratio of 0.45% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $40 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MID or VXUS?
Over the past year MID returned +4.70% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), MID annualized +9.64% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MID or VXUS?
MID has been the more volatile fund at 20.5% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: MID -40.1% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both MID and VXUS?
MID and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MID and VXUS?
MID and VXUS share 2 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7893 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MID or VXUS?
MID yields 0.15% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.