MID vs VYM
American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, MID or VYM?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MID | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $103M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.14% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 35 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +4.46% | +12.29%Best |
| 1Y Return | +1.84% | +16.61%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.51% | +17.42%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.94% | +12.12%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.4% | 13.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -40.1% | -15.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,559 | $17,718Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 52.3% | 26.1%Best |
| Fund Family | American Century Investments | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jul 15, 2020 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 15, 2020 to Sep 17, 2026 (6.2 years).
MID vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.2 years both funds cover.
MID vs VYM Performance
American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF (MID) is an ETF from American Century Investments and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MID returned +1.84% while VYM returned +16.61%. Year to date, MID is up 4.46% versus a gain of 12.29% for VYM.
Over three years, MID compounded at +14.51% per year against +17.42% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +2.94% and +12.12% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +14.59% annualized vs +9.24%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MID has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.4% compared with 13.8% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -40.1% for MID and -15.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MID charges 0.39% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $4 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MID currently yields 0.14% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
13.8% of MID's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.7% of VYM's money is in holdings MID also owns.
MID and VYM share little of their money.
3 positions in common, counted across the 34 positions we hold weights for in MID and 557 in VYM, against full books of 35 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 525 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for MID (96.4% of the fund), and 28 for MID that do not appear in VYM (79.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of MID and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MID or VYM?
MID has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $35 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MID or VYM?
Over the past year MID returned +1.84% vs +16.61% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), MID annualized +9.24% vs +14.59% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MID or VYM?
MID has been the more volatile fund at 20.4% annualized versus 13.8% for VYM. Worst drawdown: MID -40.1% vs VYM -15.8%.
Should I hold both MID and VYM?
MID and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between MID and VYM?
13.8% of MID's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.7% of VYM's is in holdings MID also owns. They hold 3 positions in common, counted across the 34 positions we hold weights for in MID and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, MID or VYM?
MID yields 0.14% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than MID?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.