MLDR vs QQQ
Global X Intermediate-Term Treasury Ladder ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
MLDR has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MLDR | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.12% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $9M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.83% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 65 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | -0.87% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +1.38% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 3.8% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -4.5% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 9, 2024 | Mar 10, 1999 |
MLDR vs QQQ Performance
Global X Intermediate-Term Treasury Ladder ETF (MLDR) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year MLDR returned +1.38% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, MLDR is down 0.87% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 3.8% for MLDR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -4.5% for MLDR and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.05. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MLDR charges 0.12% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $12 vs $18 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MLDR currently yields 3.83% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MLDR or QQQ?
MLDR has an expense ratio of 0.12% while QQQ charges 0.18%. MLDR is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $6 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MLDR or QQQ?
Over the past year MLDR returned +1.38% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MLDR annualized +1.10% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MLDR or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 3.8% for MLDR. Worst drawdown: MLDR -4.5% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both MLDR and QQQ?
MLDR and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.05, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, MLDR or QQQ?
MLDR yields 3.83% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so MLDR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.