MMLG vs VXUS
First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, MMLG or VXUS?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MMLG | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $95M | $158.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.51% |
| Holdings | 75 | 8,747 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.3% | 15.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -46.0% | -29.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5.9 years | $18,797 | $19,506Best |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 20, 2020 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 102 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. MMLG has data through Jun 4, 2026 and VXUS through Sep 14, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 5.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 22, 2020 to Jun 4, 2026 (5.9 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MMLG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.3% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -46.0% for MMLG and -29.4% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MMLG charges 0.85% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $5 annually, a gap of $80 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MMLG currently yields 0.00% against 2.51% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 76 holdings in MMLG and 8,082 in VXUS, totalling 94.9% and 88.8% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 1 positions appear in both.
The two holdings books were reported 92 days apart, MMLG as of Apr 30, 2026 and VXUS as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
1 positions in common, counted across the 76 positions we hold weights for in MMLG and 8,082 in VXUS, against full books of 75 and 8,747.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MMLG | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| SHOP:CAShopify Inc | 2.60% | 0.32% | 2.28% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of MMLG and VXUS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MMLG or VXUS?
MMLG has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $80 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, MMLG or VXUS?
MMLG has been the more volatile fund at 21.3% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: MMLG -46.0% vs VXUS -29.4%.
Should I hold both MMLG and VXUS?
MMLG and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, MMLG or VXUS?
MMLG yields 0.00% while VXUS yields 2.51%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than MMLG?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.