MOO vs QQQ
VanEck Agribusiness ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MOO | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.56% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $991M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.16% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 51 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +13.34% | +16.23% | |
| 1Y Return | +15.20% | +26.23% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +2.40% | +25.75% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.16% | +14.78% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.9% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -69.5% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 31, 2007 | Mar 10, 1999 |
MOO vs QQQ Performance
VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) is a ETF from VanEck and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year MOO returned +15.20% while QQQ returned +26.23%. Year to date, MOO is up 13.34% versus a gain of 16.23% for QQQ.
Over three years, MOO compounded at +2.40% per year against +25.75% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +0.16% and +14.78% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.02% annualized vs +5.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 20.9% for MOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -69.5% for MOO and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MOO charges 0.56% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $56 vs $18 annually, a gap of $38 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MOO currently yields 2.16% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
MOO and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 148 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MOO or QQQ?
MOO has an expense ratio of 0.56% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $38 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MOO or QQQ?
Over the past year MOO returned +15.20% vs +26.23% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), MOO annualized +5.43% vs +13.02% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MOO or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 20.9% for MOO. Worst drawdown: MOO -69.5% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both MOO and QQQ?
MOO and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MOO and QQQ?
MOO and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 148 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MOO or QQQ?
MOO yields 2.16% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so MOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.