MOO vs VOO
VanEck Agribusiness ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, MOO or VOO?
Each has led over a different period.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. MOO led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MOO | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.56% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $991M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.16% | 1.08% |
| Holdings | 51 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +19.20%Best | +13.37% |
| 1Y Return | +21.71%Best | +20.08% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.58% | +21.29%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.56% | +12.89%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.9% | 14.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -41.5% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $10,283 | $18,335Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 59.1% | 36.4%Best |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 31, 2007 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2010 to Sep 4, 2026 (16 years).
MOO vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16 years both funds cover.
MOO vs VOO Performance
VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) is an ETF from VanEck and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MOO returned +21.71% while VOO returned +20.08%. Year to date, MOO is up 19.20% versus a gain of 13.37% for VOO.
Over three years, MOO compounded at +3.58% per year against +21.29% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +0.56% and +12.89% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.48% annualized vs +6.00%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.9% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -41.5% for MOO and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MOO charges 0.56% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $56 vs $3 annually, a gap of $53 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MOO currently yields 2.16% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
40.7% of MOO's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 0.5% of VOO's money is in holdings MOO also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
8 positions in common, counted across the 47 positions we hold weights for in MOO and 505 in VOO, against full books of 51 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 489 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for MOO (99.0% of the fund), and 9 for MOO that do not appear in VOO (11.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MOO | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| DEDeere & Co Sedol 2261203 | 8.35% | 0.25% | 8.10% |
| CTVACorteva Inc Ctva | 8.07% | 0.09% | 7.98% |
| ZTSZoetis Inc, Class A | 5.25% | 0.05% | 5.20% |
| ADMArcher-Daniels-Midland Co. | 5.02% | 0.06% | 4.96% |
| CFCf Industries Holdings Inc. | 4.59% | 0.03% | 4.56% |
| TSNTyson Foods Inc. Class A | 4.31% | 0.03% | 4.28% |
| BGBunge Global Sa Common Shares | 3.28% | 0.02% | 3.26% |
| MOSMosaic Co. | 1.79% | 0.01% | 1.78% |
40.7% of MOO is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MOO or VOO?
MOO has an expense ratio of 0.56% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $53 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MOO or VOO?
Over the past year MOO returned +21.71% vs +20.08% for VOO, so MOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), MOO annualized +6.00% vs +13.48% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MOO or VOO?
MOO has been the more volatile fund at 16.9% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: MOO -41.5% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both MOO and VOO?
MOO and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between MOO and VOO?
40.7% of MOO's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 0.5% of VOO's is in holdings MOO also owns. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 47 positions we hold weights for in MOO and 505 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, MOO or VOO?
MOO yields 2.16% while VOO yields 1.08%, so MOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than MOO?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. MOO led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.