MOO vs VYM
VanEck Agribusiness ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, MOO or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. MOO led over 1Y, VYM over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MOO | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.56% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $991M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.11% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 51 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +19.01%Best | +13.75% |
| 1Y Return | +20.83%Best | +19.42% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.12% | +18.22%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.73% | +12.17%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.9% | 14.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -69.5% | -58.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $10,370 | $17,758Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 59.1% | 25.9%Best |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Aug 31, 2007 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 5, 2007 to Sep 9, 2026 (19 years).
MOO vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 19 years both funds cover.
MOO vs VYM Performance
VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) is an ETF from VanEck and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MOO returned +20.83% while VYM returned +19.42%. Year to date, MOO is up 19.01% versus a gain of 13.75% for VYM.
Over three years, MOO compounded at +4.12% per year against +18.22% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +0.73% and +12.17% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +6.96% annualized vs +5.69%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.9% compared with 14.8% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -69.5% for MOO and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MOO charges 0.56% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $56 vs $4 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MOO currently yields 2.11% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
26.9% of MOO's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.5% of VYM's money is in holdings MOO also owns.
MOO and VYM share little of their money.
10 positions in common, counted across the 47 positions we hold weights for in MOO and 603 in VYM, against full books of 51 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 558 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for MOO (96.8% of the fund), and 8 for MOO that do not appear in VYM (27.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MOO | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADMArcher-Daniels-Midland Co. | 5.02% | 0.15% | 4.87% |
| CFCf Industries Holdings Inc. | 4.59% | 0.07% | 4.52% |
| TSNTyson Foods Inc. Class A | 4.31% | 0.07% | 4.24% |
| BGBunge Global Sa Common Shares | 3.28% | 0.06% | 3.22% |
| TTCToro Co/the | 2.42% | 0.04% | 2.38% |
| CNHI:ASCnh Industrial Nv | 2.41% | 0.04% | 2.37% |
| MOSMosaic Co. | 1.79% | 0.03% | 1.76% |
| AGCOAgco Corp | 1.60% | 0.03% | 1.57% |
| CALMCal-maine Foods Inc | 1.10% | 0.01% | 1.09% |
| FMCFmc Corp. | 0.36% | 0.01% | 0.35% |
26.9% of MOO is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MOO or VYM?
MOO has an expense ratio of 0.56% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $52 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MOO or VYM?
Over the past year MOO returned +20.83% vs +19.42% for VYM, so MOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), MOO annualized +5.69% vs +6.96% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MOO or VYM?
MOO has been the more volatile fund at 20.9% annualized versus 14.8% for VYM. Worst drawdown: MOO -69.5% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both MOO and VYM?
MOO and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between MOO and VYM?
26.9% of MOO's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.5% of VYM's is in holdings MOO also owns. They hold 10 positions in common, counted across the 47 positions we hold weights for in MOO and 603 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, MOO or VYM?
MOO yields 2.11% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than MOO?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. MOO led over 1Y, VYM over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.