MOO vs VYM
VanEck Agribusiness ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MOO | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.56% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $991M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.16% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 51 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +10.41% | +15.75% | |
| 1Y Return | +13.13% | +23.85% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +1.51% | +19.14% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.63% | +12.45% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.9% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -69.5% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 31, 2007 | Nov 10, 2006 |
MOO vs VYM Performance
VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) is a ETF from VanEck and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MOO returned +13.13% while VYM returned +23.85%. Year to date, MOO is up 10.41% versus a gain of 15.75% for VYM.
Over three years, MOO compounded at +1.51% per year against +19.14% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are -0.63% and +12.45% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.06% annualized vs +5.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.9% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -69.5% for MOO and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MOO charges 0.56% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $56 vs $4 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MOO currently yields 2.16% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
MOO and VYM share 10 holdings out of 639 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MOO or VYM?
MOO has an expense ratio of 0.56% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $52 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MOO or VYM?
Over the past year MOO returned +13.13% vs +23.85% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), MOO annualized +5.29% vs +7.06% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MOO or VYM?
MOO has been the more volatile fund at 20.9% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: MOO -69.5% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both MOO and VYM?
MOO and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MOO and VYM?
MOO and VYM share 10 common holdings with a 0.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 639 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MOO or VYM?
MOO yields 2.16% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.