MOO vs VTI
VanEck Agribusiness ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MOO | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.56% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $991M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.16% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 51 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +13.34% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +15.20% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +2.40% | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.16% | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.9% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -69.5% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 31, 2007 | May 24, 2001 |
MOO vs VTI Performance
VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) is a ETF from VanEck and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MOO returned +15.20% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, MOO is up 13.34% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Over three years, MOO compounded at +2.40% per year against +21.54% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +0.16% and +12.11% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.07% annualized vs +5.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.9% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -69.5% for MOO and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MOO charges 0.56% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $56 vs $3 annually, a gap of $53 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MOO currently yields 2.16% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
MOO and VTI share 15 holdings out of 2818 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MOO or VTI?
MOO has an expense ratio of 0.56% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $53 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MOO or VTI?
Over the past year MOO returned +15.20% vs +21.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), MOO annualized +5.43% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MOO or VTI?
MOO has been the more volatile fund at 20.9% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: MOO -69.5% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both MOO and VTI?
MOO and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MOO and VTI?
MOO and VTI share 15 common holdings with a 0.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2818 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MOO or VTI?
MOO yields 2.16% while VTI yields 1.07%, so MOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.