MOO vs VTI
VanEck Agribusiness ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, MOO or VTI?
Each has led over a different period.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. MOO led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MOO | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.56% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $991M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.11% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 51 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +12.76%Best | +12.43% |
| 1Y Return | +16.14%Best | +15.92% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.68% | +22.42%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.37% | +12.37%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.9% | 16.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -69.5% | -56.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $9,816 | $17,916Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 59.6% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 31, 2007 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 5, 2007 to Sep 28, 2026 (19.1 years).
MOO vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 19.1 years both funds cover.
MOO vs VTI Performance
VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) is an ETF from VanEck and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MOO returned +16.14% while VTI returned +15.92%. Year to date, MOO is up 12.76% versus a gain of 12.43% for VTI.
Over three years, MOO compounded at +3.68% per year against +22.42% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -0.37% and +12.37% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +9.39% annualized vs +5.37%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.9% compared with 16.1% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -69.5% for MOO and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MOO charges 0.56% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $56 vs $3 annually, a gap of $53 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MOO currently yields 2.11% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
54.1% of MOO's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.5% of VTI's money is in holdings MOO also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
17 positions in common, counted across the 47 positions we hold weights for in MOO and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 51 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,137 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for MOO (96.9% of the fund), and 1 for MOO that do not appear in VTI (0.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MOO | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| DEDeere & Co Sedol 2261203 | 8.58% | 0.21% | 8.37% |
| CTVACorteva Inc Ctva | 8.38% | 0.07% | 8.31% |
| ADMArcher-Daniels-Midland Co. | 5.08% | 0.05% | 5.03% |
| ZTSZoetis Inc, Class A | 5.07% | 0.04% | 5.03% |
| CFCf Industries Holdings Inc. | 4.96% | 0.03% | 4.93% |
| TSNTyson Foods Inc. Class A | 3.80% | 0.02% | 3.78% |
| BGBunge Global Sa Common Shares | 3.46% | 0.02% | 3.44% |
| DARDarling Ingredients, Inc. | 2.74% | 0.01% | 2.73% |
| CNHI:ASCnh Industrial Nv | 2.59% | 0.01% | 2.58% |
| TTCToro Co/the | 2.23% | 0.01% | 2.22% |
54.1% of MOO is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MOO or VTI?
MOO has an expense ratio of 0.56% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $53 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MOO or VTI?
Over the past year MOO returned +16.14% vs +15.92% for VTI, so MOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), MOO annualized +5.37% vs +9.39% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MOO or VTI?
MOO has been the more volatile fund at 20.9% annualized versus 16.1% for VTI. Worst drawdown: MOO -69.5% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both MOO and VTI?
MOO and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between MOO and VTI?
54.1% of MOO's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.5% of VTI's is in holdings MOO also owns. They hold 17 positions in common, counted across the 47 positions we hold weights for in MOO and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, MOO or VTI?
MOO yields 2.11% while VTI yields 1.03%, so MOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than MOO?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. MOO led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.