MOOD vs VOO
Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. MOOD delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MOOD | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.73% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $131M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.36% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 10 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +14.91% | +13.44% | |
| 1Y Return | +31.85% | +22.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.44% | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.5% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -14.3% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Relative Sentiment technologies | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | May 19, 2022 | Sep 7, 2010 |
MOOD vs VOO Performance
Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD) is a ETF from Relative Sentiment technologies and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MOOD returned +31.85% while VOO returned +22.62%. Year to date, MOOD is up 14.91% versus a gain of 13.44% for VOO.
Over three years, MOOD compounded at +21.44% per year against +21.47% for VOO. Across the full 4-year window we track, MOOD has the edge at +16.01% annualized vs +13.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 12.5% for MOOD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.3% for MOOD and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MOOD charges 0.73% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $73 vs $3 annually, a gap of $70 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MOOD currently yields 0.36% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
MOOD and VOO share 0 holdings out of 514 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MOOD or VOO?
MOOD has an expense ratio of 0.73% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $70 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MOOD or VOO?
Over the past year MOOD returned +31.85% vs +22.62% for VOO, so MOOD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), MOOD annualized +16.01% vs +13.55% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MOOD or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 12.5% for MOOD. Worst drawdown: MOOD -14.3% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both MOOD and VOO?
MOOD and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MOOD and VOO?
MOOD and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 514 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MOOD or VOO?
MOOD yields 0.36% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.