MRNY vs QQQ
YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. MRNY delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MRNY | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.27% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $120M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 99.96% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 18 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +280.50% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +314.78% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 100.6% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -82.2% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | YieldMax ETF | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 23, 2023 | Mar 10, 1999 |
MRNY vs QQQ Performance
YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF (MRNY) is a ETF from YieldMax ETF and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year MRNY returned +314.78% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, MRNY is up 280.50% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MRNY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 100.6% compared with 30.6% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -82.2% for MRNY and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.06. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MRNY charges 1.27% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $127 vs $18 annually, a gap of $109 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MRNY currently yields 99.96% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
MRNY and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 105 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MRNY or QQQ?
MRNY has an expense ratio of 1.27% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $109 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MRNY or QQQ?
Over the past year MRNY returned +314.78% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so MRNY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), MRNY annualized +7.76% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MRNY or QQQ?
MRNY has been the more volatile fund at 100.6% annualized versus 30.6% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: MRNY -82.2% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both MRNY and QQQ?
MRNY and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.06, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MRNY and QQQ?
MRNY and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 105 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MRNY or QQQ?
MRNY yields 99.96% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so MRNY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.