MSFL vs VTI

MSFL vs VTI

Which is better, MSFL or VTI?

VTI has been ahead.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricMSFLVTI
Expense Ratio1.15%0.03%Best
AUM$74M$666.9B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.07%
Holdings23,543
YTD Return-2.92%+13.59%Best
1Y Return-18.38%+20.00%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+20.95%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.81%
Volatility (annualized)60.6%12.3%Best
Max Drawdown-62.1%-19.3%Best
$10,000 over 2.5 years$9,866$15,464Best
Fund FamilyGraniteSharesVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionMar 4, 2024May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 18, 2024 to Sep 4, 2026 (2.5 years).

MSFL vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.5 years both funds cover.

MSFL vs VTI Performance

GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL) is an ETF from GraniteShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MSFL returned -18.38% while VTI returned +20.00%. Year to date, MSFL is down 2.92% versus a gain of 13.59% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

MSFL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 60.6% compared with 12.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -62.1% for MSFL and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.51. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

MSFL charges 1.15% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $115 vs $3 annually, a gap of $112 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MSFL currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 1 holding in MSFL and 2,787 in VTI, totalling 66.6% and 92.3% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 1 positions appear in both.

1 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in MSFL and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 2 and 3,543.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in MSFLWeight in VTIDifference
MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 3766.64%3.81%62.83%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of MSFL and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

MSFLVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, MSFL or VTI?

MSFL has an expense ratio of 1.15% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $112 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, MSFL or VTI?

Over the past year MSFL returned -18.38% vs +20.00% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, MSFL or VTI?

MSFL has been the more volatile fund at 60.6% annualized versus 12.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: MSFL -62.1% vs VTI -19.3%.

Should I hold both MSFL and VTI?

MSFL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.51, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, MSFL or VTI?

MSFL yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than MSFL?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.