MSFL vs VTI
GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MSFL | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.15% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $124M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 2 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +0.31% | +14.16% | |
| 1Y Return | -20.48% | +23.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.33% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 61.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -62.1% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 4, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
MSFL vs VTI Performance
GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL) is a ETF from GraniteShares and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MSFL returned -20.48% while VTI returned +23.62%. Year to date, MSFL is up 0.31% versus a gain of 14.16% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MSFL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 61.6% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -62.1% for MSFL and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.51. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MSFL charges 1.15% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $115 vs $3 annually, a gap of $112 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MSFL currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
MSFL and VTI share 1 holdings out of 2783 unique holdings combined, representing a 3.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MSFL | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFT | 66.65% | 3.81% | 62.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MSFL or VTI?
MSFL has an expense ratio of 1.15% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $112 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MSFL or VTI?
Over the past year MSFL returned -20.48% vs +23.62% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MSFL annualized +0.81% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MSFL or VTI?
MSFL has been the more volatile fund at 61.6% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: MSFL -62.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both MSFL and VTI?
MSFL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.51, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MSFL and VTI?
MSFL and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 3.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2783 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MSFL or VTI?
MSFL yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.