MSFL vs VOO
MSFL vs VOO
GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MSFL | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.15% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $124M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 2 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -2.08% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | -22.06% | +23.71% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.50% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 61.3% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -62.1% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 4, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
MSFL vs VOO Performance
GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL) is a ETF from GraniteShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MSFL returned -22.06% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, MSFL is down 2.08% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MSFL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 61.3% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -62.1% for MSFL and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.55. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MSFL charges 1.15% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $115 vs $3 annually, a gap of $112 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MSFL currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
MSFL and VOO share 1 holdings out of 505 unique holdings combined, representing a 4.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MSFL | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFT | 66.65% | 4.30% | 62.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MSFL or VOO?
MSFL has an expense ratio of 1.15% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $112 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MSFL or VOO?
Over the past year MSFL returned -22.06% vs +23.71% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MSFL annualized -0.19% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MSFL or VOO?
MSFL has been the more volatile fund at 61.3% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: MSFL -62.1% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both MSFL and VOO?
MSFL and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.55, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MSFL and VOO?
MSFL and VOO share 1 common holdings with a 4.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 505 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MSFL or VOO?
MSFL yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.