MSFL vs VOO

MSFL vs VOO

Which is better, MSFL or VOO?

VOO has been ahead.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricMSFLVOO
Expense Ratio1.15%0.03%Best
AUM$69M$997.4B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.04%
Holdings2509
YTD Return-5.85%+12.37%Best
1Y Return-20.64%+16.61%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.37%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.49%
Volatility (annualized)60.7%12.2%Best
Max Drawdown-62.1%-18.7%Best
$10,000 over 2.5 years$9,571$15,305Best
Fund FamilyGraniteSharesVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionMar 4, 2024Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 18, 2024 to Sep 18, 2026 (2.5 years).

MSFL vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.5 years both funds cover.

MSFL vs VOO Performance

GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL) is an ETF from GraniteShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MSFL returned -20.64% while VOO returned +16.61%. Year to date, MSFL is down 5.85% versus a gain of 12.37% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

MSFL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 60.7% compared with 12.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -62.1% for MSFL and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.55. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

MSFL charges 1.15% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $115 vs $3 annually, a gap of $112 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MSFL currently yields 0.00% against 1.04% for VOO.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of MSFL and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

MSFLVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, MSFL or VOO?

MSFL has an expense ratio of 1.15% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $112 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, MSFL or VOO?

Over the past year MSFL returned -20.64% vs +16.61% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, MSFL or VOO?

MSFL has been the more volatile fund at 60.7% annualized versus 12.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: MSFL -62.1% vs VOO -18.7%.

Should I hold both MSFL and VOO?

MSFL and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.55, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, MSFL or VOO?

MSFL yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than MSFL?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.